Micah Smith | Architect

Archive for ‘March, 2013’

athens parthenon

History of Architecture – Ancient Greece

History of Architecture – Ancient Greece

Recently I completed a course in History of ArchitectureArch218 at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, which I took for professional development as well as an obvious interest in the subject.  I loved the class and want to follow up with a blog to help me retain what I learned and share it with others. So if you are interested in joining me, I am setting out to retrace the “course of architectural history!” I will be going back to my lecture notes, text books, and web links to provide a series of blog posts relating to each of the lectures that covers the Middle Ages (~1200 CE) to the Industrial Revolution (~ 1800 CE). My first two posts in this series will look briefly at the Classical eras of Greek and Roman architecture  because these two epochs are fundamental to a discussion of subsequent European architectural history. Classic Greek and Roman architecture has influenced many styles including Romanesque, Renaissance, Baroque, and Neoclassical.

Greece was a powerful maritime empire in the Mediterranean in the 6th century BCE when they began to use stone construction. Previously Greeks built mostly wooden and mud-brick structures but became influenced by the monumental stone structures of the Egyptians, who were trade partners. The wealth accumulated by various Greek colonies from trade contributed to the construction of monumental stone temples. Most Greek temples were built in Greek colonies throughout the Mediterranean and beyond, and to a lesser degree in mainland Greece. The decline and eventual end of large Greek temple construction came over the 3rd through 1st centuries BCE as political and economic power shifted toward the Roman Empire.

Reconstruction of the west facade of the Temple of Artemis, 600-580 BCE, Korkyra (Corfu)

Reconstruction of the west facade of the Temple of Artemis, 600-580 BCE, Korkyra (Corfu)
Photo Credit http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Arts/CorfuArtemis/CorfuTemplePlan.jpg}Image

Sculptures from the Pediment of the Temple of Artemis at the Archaeological Museum in Corfu photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gorgon_at_the_Archaeological_Museum_in_Corfu.jpg

Sculptures from the Pediment of the Temple of Artemis at the Archaeological Museum in Corfu
photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gorgon_at_the_Archaeological_Museum_in_Corfu.jpg

Rendering of an ancient Greek architectural paint scheme. photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greek_art

Example of ancient Greek architectural paint scheme. photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greek_art

The first example of a stone Doric temple (a-la the Parthenon) was the Temple of Artemis at Corfu, 600-580 BCE. This stone temple, now in ruins, had a triangular rooftop called a pediment, supported by the Doric order of columns, architrave, frieze and cornice that became common in Greek and Roman architecture. Although typical images of Greek temples are of monochromatic stone, they had brightly painted details – especially at the frieze. However, centuries of weathering has faded nearly all of the color.

 

Typical plan for a Greek temple http://www.thewaxtablet.com/2012/02/08/the-ancient-greek-temple-an-introduction-to-architectural-layouts/

Typical plan for a Greek temple http://www.thewaxtablet.com/2012/02/08/the-ancient-greek-temple-an-introduction-to-architectural-layouts/

The basic elements of the Greek temple floor plan are the naos (central structure housing a statue of the god the temple was built for), the pronaos (front porch extension of the naos), the opisthodomos (back porch extension of the naos), and the peristasis, which is the series of columns surrounding the central structure. One very notable Greek construction technique is the use of optical refinements throughout a temple structure. These refinements included a slight upward curve of the temple base or stylobate, as well as the architrave above. Columns are each shaped with an entasis, or a reduction in diameter as they rise. The columns also tilt slightly inward, especially at the corners, and are spaced slightly closer together at the corners than in the middle of the peristasis. Together these refinements help produce a much more dynamic and stout appearance when compared to more recent Neoclassical or Greek Revival buildings that borrow from Ancient Greece. Compare the British Museum in London with the Parthenon, which may be the best example of Greek optical refinement.

exaggerated illustration of the Parthenon's optical refinements

An exaggerated illustration of the Parthenon’s optical refinements. Photo credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Opticorr.JPG

British Museum London

The British Museum, London. The facade is an obvious copy of the Parthenon, but the Greek Revival building appears more stiff and weaker at the columns. Photo credit: http://world-placez.blogspot.com/2013/02/British-Museum-England-Info.html

 

Parthenon closeup

The Parthenon, as rough as it is now, still appears stout. Photo credit: http://archidialog.com/2011/01/16/david-chipperfield-oscar-niemeyer-the-parthenon-conscious-inspiration/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Parthenon, a temple for the patron goddess Athena, is located on the Acropolis of Athens. Built in the 5th century BCE, it is maybe the most important remaining Classic Greek building and the height of the Doric order. Originally a temple, It has also served as a Greek treasury, a Christian church, an Ottoman mosque, and an Ottoman ammunition depot. Because Greece became a Byzantine (later an Ottoman) territory, it was politically closed to Western Europe for centuries. It was not until the end of the 18th century that the ancient Greek architecture of Athens was “rediscovered” due to a more politically open Ottoman Empire.

Parthenon restoration

Parthenon restoration. Photo credit: http://www.ronsaari.com/stockImages/greece/AthensParthenon1.php

The Parthenon, 447-32 BCE, is the iconic Greek temple. Unfortunately today it is largely in ruins, although It was a mostly intact until 1687 when it was bombarded by the Venetians. Most of the damage was actually caused by the fact the Ottomans were using the Parthenon as an ammunition depot, which may have been why the building was targeted. The explosion blew the roof off the building and nearly destroyed it completely. More controversy occurred in 1806 when the Ottomans allowed the British ambassador, the Earl of Elgin, to take a majority of the ancient Greek frieze that adorned the top of the Pantheon. Many of those sculptures, known as the Elgin Marbles or Parthenon Marbles, are now displayed in London’s British Museum, but Greece has repeatedly asked for their return and has even built a museum to display them if/when they are returned. A recently completed partial restoration of the Parthenon took over 30 years, using original pieces where possible and new marble (from the original quarry) where needed. It is amazing to think it took less than 9 years to build the original structure (plus a few more years for decoration).

Although ancient Greek architecture heavily influenced Roman architecture, the two styles are different in many ways. The Romans were influence by Greece as well as other ancient peoples, but used their own building types, spaces and forms to reflect their civic-oriented culture and city planning. Thank you for reading and please come back soon for my next post in this series on ancient Roman architecture. In the mean time check out this terrific Nova episode “Secrets of the Parthenon” and this Chicago Tribune photo gallery of the restoration.

secondary dwelling exterior ramp

Aging in Place – Your Home Can Age Gracefully Too!

I have been able to spend a fair amount of time with my parents in recent years as they have moved, part-time, to the San Luis Obispo area. Recently I am noticing my mother having more and more difficulty with her mobility. As an architect with some understanding of accessible design, it is difficult seeing her struggle with mobility in her own home. Fortunately most homes, including my parents, can be adapted for improved accessibility. My parents, along with many other households, face decisions on adaptation of their home. The US Census Bureau provides statistics that help illustrate how many people we are talking about.

The 2010 US Census reports that 13% of the population is age 65 and over, but that demographic is growing.  The 2000 Census 65-and-over population of 35 million increased to 40 million for the 2010 Census (a 15% increase) and the 2020 projection is for 55 million (a 36% increase for that decade). The 2010 Census also shows that for those age 65-69, nearly 25% report severe disability. Of course that rate increases by age –  see Figure 1 below. More and more of us will have to adapt our homes for accessibility if we want to maintain a comfortable standard of living. So what can we do to facilitate aging in place?

Disability-Prevalence-by-Age

Disability Prevalence by Age, from Americans With Disabilities: 2010, Matthew W. Brault, 2012 http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf

There are different levels of adaptation to consider depending on many factors including individual needs, current conditions, and budget. Adaptations can range from DIY projects easily accomplished by typical homeowners, to more substantial modification of finishes, fixtures, and structure that require design professionals and contractors. The Iowa Program for Assistive Technology at the University of Iowa has published a terrific checklist called the Practical Guide to Universal Home Design. The guide addresses remodeling, building a new home, and buying or renting a home. I encourage you to refer to this as a starting point to plan for the future or to regain full enjoyment and livability of your home. As an example, the image below shows good planning for future accessibility needs. This home is a secondary dwelling, sometimes referred to as a “granny flat” or “in-law flat,” that was built by the property owners for the wife’s parents. Although the ramp was not needed initially, it was included during construction because it is much easier to add such a feature during construction of the house and hardscape. The ramp does not have a handrail and may be too steep to be ADA compliant, but it does not have to be compliant because it is for a private residence. This ramp did however meet the homeowners’ requirements and could be easily outfitted with a handrail when needed. A set of stairs are also included and are located on the far end of the planter, providing a more direct path to the front door for those who can negotiate stairs.

secondary dwelling exterior ramp

Good planning for the future! Exterior ramp for a secondary housing unit (granny flat), MS|Architecture, Photo: Micah Smith

In subsequent posts I will provide a general overview of universal home design by discussing strategies for remodeling an existing home as well as building a new home. I will use the many available resources including the above guide, the California Building Code, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and my own experience to address basic strategies. Please contact me if you have specific questions or would like assistance improving your home’s accessibility. I can be reached at 805-704-7118 or micah@msmith-arch.com.